Hypothesis Testing in Ethnobotany: 30 years After Phillips & Gentry's Seminal Work

Albuquerque UP, Oliveira RF. 2007. Is the use-impact on native Caatinga species in Brazil reduced by the high species richness of medicinal plants? Journal of Ethnopharmacology 113:156–170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2007.05.025

Albuquerque UP, Nascimento ALB, Soldati GT, Feitosa IS, Campos JLA, Hurrell JA, Hanazaki N, Medeiros PM, Silva RRV, Ludwinsky RH, Ferreira Júnior WS, Reyes-García V. 2019a. Ten important questions/issues for ethnobotanical research. Acta Botanica Brasilica 33:376-385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-33062018abb0331

Albuquerque UP, Medeiros PM, Ferreira Júnior WS, Silva TC, Silva RRV, Gonçalves-Souza T. 2019b. Social-ecological theory of maximization: basic concepts and two initial models. Biological Theory 14:73–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-019-00316-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-019-00316-8

Albuquerque UP, Ludwig D, Feitosa IS, et al. 2020. Addressing Social-Ecological Systems across Temporal and Spatial Scales: A Conceptual Synthesis for Ethnobiology. Human Ecology 48:557–571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-020-00189-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-020-00189-7

Betts MG, Hadley AS, Frey DW, Frey SJK, Gannon D, Harris SH, Kim H, Kormann UG, Leimberger K, Moriarty K, Northrup JM, Phalan B, Rousseau JS, Stokely TD, Valente JJ, Wolf C, Zárrate-Charry D. 2021. When are hypotheses useful in ecology and evolution? Ecology and Evolution 11:5762-5776. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7365

Farji-Brener AG. 2003. Uso correcto, parcial e incorrecto de los términos "hipótesis" y "predicciones" en ecología. Ecología Austral 13:223-227.

Farji-Brener AG. 2022. ¿Plantear o no plantear hipótesis? Sugerencias para estudiantes, directores y revisores. Ecología Austral 32:434-443. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.22.32.2.0.1914

Ferreira Júnior WS. 2020. Reflections on the theoretical advance in ethnobiology: Are we pointing to the wrong direction? Ethnobiology and Conservation 9:20.

Gaoue OG, Coe MA, Bond M, Hart G, Seyler BC, Mcmillen H. 2017. Theories and major hypotheses in ethnobotany. Economic Botany 71:269–287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-017-9389-8

Gaoue OG, Moutouama JK, Coe MA, Bond MO, Green E, Sero NB, Bezeng BS, Yessoufou K. 2021. Methodological advances for hypothesis-driven ethnobiology. Biological Reviews 96:2281-2303. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12752. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12752

Gonçalves-Souza T, Provete DB, Garey MV, Silva FR, Albuquerque UP. 2019. Going back to basics: How to master the art of making scientifically sound questions. In: Albuquerque UP, Cunha LVF, Lucena RFP, Alves RRN (Eds.) Methods and Techniques in Ethnobiology and Ethnoecology. Springer: New York. p. 71-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-8919-5_7

Gonçalves PHS, Albuquerque UP, Medeiros, PM. 2016. The most commonly available woody plant species are the most useful for human populations: a meta-analysis. Ecol Appl. 26: 2238-2253. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1364 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1364

Phillips O, Gentry AH. 1993. The useful plants of Tambopata, Peru: I. Statistical hypothesis tests with a new quantitative technique. Economic Botany 47:15–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02862203

Ramos MA, Melo JG, Albuquerque UP. 2012. Citation behavior in popular scientific papers: What is behind obscure citations? The case of ethnobotany. Scientometrics 92:711-719. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0662-4

Vandebroek I, Pieroni A, Stepp JR, Hanazaki N, Ladio A, Alves RRN, Picking D, Delgoda R, Maroyi A, van Andel T, Quave CL, Paniagua-Zambrana NY, Bussmann RW, Odonne G, Abbasi AM, Albuquerque UP, Baker J, Kutz S, Timsina S, Shigeta M, Oliveira TPR, Hurrell JA, Arenas PM, Puentes JP, Hugé J, Yesil Y, Pierre LJ, Olango TM, Dahdouh-Guebas F. 2020. Reshaping the future of ethnobiology research after the COVID-19 pandemic. Nature Plants 6:723-730. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-020-0691-6