Local criteria for the selection of wild food plants for consumption and sale in Alagoas, Brazil
Visualizações: 1986DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15451/ec2020-04-9.10-1-15Keywords:
Edible plants, Ethnobotany, Local knowledge, Selection criteriaAbstract
Understanding the reasons for the consumption of certain plant resources instead of others has important implications for biological conservation. This study aimed to answer the following question: What are the factors that determine the consumption and perceived commercial potential of certain wild fruit species among extractivists from two rural communities in northeastern Brazil? This study developed a participatory approach to identify the fruit species known and/or used by extractivists. The selected species were presented to the extractivists using semi-structured interviews. A Likert scale (from 1 to 5) was used by interviewees to assign scores to 17 wild fruits in terms of local consumption, commercial potential, taste, nutritional potential, adverse effects, post-harvest durability, additional uses, temporal availability (fruit), spatial availability (fruit), spatial availability (plant), ease of collection, and ease of cultivation. Multiple regression analysis was performed to show the variables that best explained the selection of plants for consumption and sale. The results showed that only taste determined the commercial potential of plants, while taste and nutritional potential were the variables that best explained domestic consumption. In contexts in which edible wild plants do not form the base of the local diet, taste may be more relevant in relation to other variables such as availability and nutritional potential.
Downloads
References
Alagoas. Secretary of State for Economic Planning and Development. Municipal Profile: Piaçabuçu. 3. ed. Maceio: 2018. 35 p.
Albuquerque UP, Lucena PFP, Alencar, NL (2010) Methods and techniques for ethnobiological data collection. In: Albuquerque UP, Lucena RFP, Wedge LVFC. (eds). Methods and technics in ethnobiological and ethnoecological research. 1ed. NUPEAE, Recife, pp. 41-64
Belcher B, Ruíz Pérez M and Achdiawan R (2005). Global patterns and trends in the use and management of commercial NTFPs: implications for livelihoods and conservation. World Development 33:1435-1452. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.10.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.10.007
Bell S (2001). Landscape pattern, perception and visualization the visual management of forest. Landscape and Urban Planning 54:201-221. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00136-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00136-0
Bellia G, and Pieroni A, (2015) Isolated, but transnational: The glocal nature of Waldensian ethnobotany, Western Alps, NW Italy. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 11:37. doi: 10.1186/s13002-015-0027-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-015-0027-1
Bortolotto IM, Mello de Amorozo MC, Neto GG, Oldeland J, Damasceno-Junior GA (2015) Knowledge and use of wild edible plants in rural communities along Paraguay River, Pantanal, Brazil. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 11:46. doi: 10.1186/s13002-015-0026-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-015-0026-2
Bussmann RW, Zambrana NYP, Sikharulidze S, Kikvidze Z, Kikodze D, Chelidze D, Khutsishvili M, Batsatsashvili K, and Hart RE (2016) A comparative ethnobotany of Khevsureti, Samtskhe-Javakheti, Tusheti, Svankhumeti, and Racha-Lechi I, Republic of Georgia (Sakartvelo), Caucasus. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 12:43. doi: 10.1186/s13002-016-0110-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-016-0110-2
Cabral SAS, Azevedo Júnior SM, Larrazábal MA (2006) Seasonal abundance of migratory birds in the Environmental Protection Area of Piaçabuçu, Alagoas, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 23:865-869. doi: 10.1590/S0101-81752006000300033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81752006000300033
Cruz MP, Medeiros PM, Sarmiento-Combariza I, Peroni N, Albuquerque UP (2014) “I eat the manofê so it is not forgotten”: local perceptions and consumption of native wild edible plants from seasonal dry forests in Brazil. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 10:45. doi: 10.1186/1746-4269-10-45 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-10-45
Gama ADS, de Paula M, da Silva RRV, Ferreira Júnior WS, Medeiros PM (2018) Exotic species as models to understand biocultural adaptation: Challenges to mainstream views of human-nature relations. PLoS One 13: e0196091. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196091 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196091
Ghirardini MP, Carli M, Del Vecchio N, Rovati A, Cova O, Valigi F, Agnetti G, Macconi M, Adamo D, Traina M, Laudini F, Marcheselli I, Caruso N, Gedda T, Donati F, Marzadro A, Russi P, Spaggiari C, Bianco M, Binda R E, Tognacci A, Girardo M, Vaschetti L, Caprino P, Sesti E, Andreozzi G, Coletto E, Belzer G, Pieroni A (2007) The importance of taste. A comparative study on wild food plants consumption in twenty-one local communities in Italy. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 17:14. doi: 10.1186/1746-4269-3-22 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-3-22
Gonçalves PHS, Albuquerque UP, Medeiros PM (2016) The most commonly available woody plant species are the most useful for human populations: a meta-analysis. Ecological applications 26:2238-2253. doi: 10.1002/eap.1364 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1364
Hawkes K, Hill K, O’Connell JF (1982) Why hunters gather: optimal foraging and the Aché of eastern Paraguay. American Ethnologist 9:379-398. doi: 10.1525/ae.1982.9.2.02a00100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1982.9.2.02a00100
Jacquier C, Bonthoux F, Baciu M, Ruffieux B (2012) Improving the effectiveness of nutritional information policies: assessment of unconscious pleasure mechanisms involved in food-choice decisions. Nutrition Reviews 70:118-131. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2011.00447.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-4887.2011.00447.x
Köster EP (2009) Diversity in the determinants of food choice: A psychological perspective. Food Quality and Preference 20:70-82. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2007.11.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2007.11.002
Mahapatra AK, and Panda PC (2012) Wild edible fruit diversity and its significance in the livelihood of indigenous tribals: evidence from eastern India. Food Security 4:219-234. doi: 10.1007/s12571-012-0186-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-012-0186-z
Moerman, DE (1979). Symbols and selectivity: A statistical analysis of native american medical ethnobotany. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 1:111-119. doi: 10.1016/0378-8741(79)90002-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8741(79)90002-3
Molina M, Tardío J, Aceituno-Mata L, Morales R, Reyes-García V, and Pardo-de-Santayana M (2014) Weeds and food diversity: Natural yield assessment and future alternatives for traditionally consumed wild vegetables. Journal of Ethnobiology 34:44-47. doi: 10.2993/0278-0771-34.1.44 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2993/0278-0771-34.1.44
N’Danikou S, Achigan-dako EG, Wong JLG. (2011) Eliciting Local Values of Wild Edible Plants in Southern Bénin to Identify Priority Species for Conservation. Economic Botany 65:381-395. doi: 10.1007/s12231-011-9178-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-011-9178-8
Ong HG, and Kim YD (2016) The role of wild edible plants in household food security among transitioning hunter-gatherers: evidence from the Philippines. Food Security doi: 10.1007/s12571-016-0630-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-016-0630-6
Pieroni A and Quave CL (2005) Traditional pharmacopoeias and medicines among Albanians and Italians in Southern Italy: The comparison. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 101: 258-270. doi:10.1016/j.jep.2005.04.028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2005.04.028
Pieroni A and Soukend R (2018) Forest as Stronghold of local ecological pratice currently used wild food plants in Polesia Northern Ukraine. Economic Botany 72:311-331. doi: 10.1007/s12231-018-9425-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-018-9425-3
Reddy KN, Pattanaik C, Reddy CS, Raju VS (2007) Traditional knowledge on wild food plants in Andhra Pradesh. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge 6:223-229.
Reyes-García V, Vadez V, Huanca T, Leonard W and Wilkie D (2005) Knowledge and Consumption of Wild Plants: A comparative study in two Tsimane’ villages in the Bolivian Amazon. Ethnobotany Research and Applications 3:2001-2008. doi: mber 2005Ethnobotany Research and Applications 3(3) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17348/era.3.0.201-208
17348/era.3.0.201-208
Robles Arias DM, Cevallos D, Gaoue OG, Fadiman MG, Hindle T (2020) Non-random medicinal plants selection in the Kichwa community of the Ecuadorian Amazon. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 246:112220. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2019.112220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2019.112220
Ribeiro JPO, Ribeiro JES, Sousa RF, Lima JRF, Oliveira RS, Alves ACB, Jardim J G, Lucena RFP (2014) Can ecological apparency explain the use of plant species in the semi-arid depression of Northeastern Brazil? Acta Botanica Brasilica 28:476-483. doi: 10.1590/0102-33062014abb2758 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-33062014abb2758
Santos CS, Barros FN, Paula M, Rando J, Nascimento VT, Medeiros PM (2018) What matters when prioritizing the medicinal plant? A study of local criteria for their diff erential use. Acta Botanica Brasilica 32:297-302. doi: 10.1590/0102-33062017abb0336 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-33062017abb0336
Serrasolses G, Calvet-Mir L, Carrió E, D’Ambrosio U, Garnatje T, Parada M, Vallès J, and Reyes-García V (2016) A matter of taste: Local explanations for the consumption of wild food plants in the Catalan Pyrenees and the Balearic Islands. Economic Botany 70:176-189. doi: 10.1007/s12231-016-9343-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-016-9343-1
Silva ES (2017) Food plants in agricultural communities in the municipality of Rio Preto da Eva-AM. 67f. Dissertation (Master's Degree in Biological Sciences) - Graduate Program in Botany, National Institute of Research of the Amazon (INPA).
Soldati GT, Medeiros PM, Duque-Brasil R, Coelho FMG, Albuquerque UP (2017) How do people select plants for use? Matching the Ecological Apparency Hypothesis with Optimal Foraging Theory. Environment, Development and Sustainability 19: 2143-216. doi: 10.1007/s10668-016-9844-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-016-9844-1
Sorokowska A, Pellegrino R, Butovskaya M, Marczak M, Niemczyk A, Huanca T, Sorokowski P (2017) Dietary customs and food avaibility shape the preferences for basic tastes: A cross-cultural study among Polish, Tsimane' and Hadza societies. Appetite 116:291-296. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.05.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2017.05.015
Sõukand R and Pieroni A (2016) The importance of a border: Medical, veterinary, and wild food ethnobotany of the Hutsuls living on the Romanian and Ukrainian sides of Bukovina. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 185:17-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2016.03.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2016.03.009
Sousa RS, Medeiros PM and Albuquerque UP (2019) Can socioeconomic factors explain the local importance of culturally salient plants in a social-ecological system? Acta Botanica Brasilica 33:283-291. doi: 10.1590/0102-33062018abb0320 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-33062018abb0320
Stryamets N, Elbakidze M, Ceuterick M, Angelstam P, and AxelssonR (2015) From economic survival to recreation: Contemporary uses of wild food and medicine in rural Sweden, Ukraine and NW Russia. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 11:53. doi: 10.1186/s13002-015-0036-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-015-0036-0
Thakur D, Sharma A and Uniyal SKR, (2017) Why they eat, what they eat patterns of wild edible plants consumpition in a tribal area of Westen Himalaya. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 13:70. doi: 10.1186/s13002-017-0198-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-017-0198-z
Turner NJ, Łuczaj ŁJ, Migliorini P, Pieroni A, Dreon AL, Sacchetti LE and Paoletti MG (2011) Edible and tended wild plants, traditional ecological knowledge and agroecology. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 30:198-225. doi: 10.1080/07352689.2011.554492 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07352689.2011.554492
UFCG–UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE CAMPINA GRANDE. Climatological data of the State of Alagoas: Campina Grande: UFCG-CTRN, 2019. Available at: . Access: March 2020.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Ethnobiology and Conservation
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.