Investigating cultural ecosystem services of the Caatinga on Flickr

Visualizações: 73

Authors

  • Maria Vittória Alves Santana
  • Danilo Vicente Batista Oliveira
  • Ulysses Albuquerque Universidade Federal de PernambucoBrazil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15451/ec2024-10-14.08-1-9

Keywords:

Caatinga, Culturomics, Conservation, Flickr, Ecosystem Services, Social Network

Abstract

Public interest in nature can be promoted through social media by assessing the importance of a species to people and identifying new emblems of conservationist appeal. We aimed to assess the public interest in cultural ecosystem services in the Caatinga (seasonal dry forest). Ecosystem services were categorized based on approximately 1500 photographs posted on Flickr. These photographs were analyzed using manual and deep-learning (DL) approaches. The most observed categories for both approaches were “Enjoyment of the Landscape” (36.8%), “Appreciation of Nature – Animals’’ (25.6%), and “Social Activities” (19.3%). However, we found significant differences between manual and DL classifications owing to the difficulties in classifying categories using the DL model. The findings suggest a low cultural ecosystem service representation on the photo-sharing platform Flickr in the Caatinga region, even after removing 67% of the collected data. This may be attributed to the limited interest in Flickr among the Caatinga residents. Deep learning (DL) techniques hold potential for studying cultural ecosystem services, but their efficacy depends on the algorithm's capacity to discern human-nature interactions and various natural elements. Our observations indicate that increasing the scale of the training and test datasets and incorporating additional categories to account for Caatinga diversity may enhance the results.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Almeida MHB, Gomes RC, Almeida OCP, Ballarin AW (2018) Desempenho da técnica deep learning na análise e categorização de imagens de defeito de madeira. Revista Energia na Agricultura 33: 284-291. doi: 10.17224/EnergAgric.2018v33n3p284-29 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17224/EnergAgric.2018v33n3p284-291

Bing (2021) www.bing.com. 30 Out. 2021.

Abadi M, Agarwal A, Barham P, Brevdo E, Chen Z, Citro C, Corrado GS, Davis A, Dean J, Devin M, Ghemawat S, Goodfellow IJ, Harp A, Irving G, Isard M, Jia Y, Józefowicz R, Kaiser L, Kudlur M, Levenberg J, Mane D, Monga R, Moore S, Murray DG, Olah C, Schuster M, Shlens J, Steiner B, Sutskever I, Talwar K, Tucker PA, Vanhoucke V, Vasudevan V, Viégas FB, Vinyals O, Warden P, Wattenberg M, Wicke M, Yu Y, Zheng X (2016) TensorFlow: Large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous distributed systems. Proceedings of the 12th USENIX conference on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI'16). USENIX Association, USA, 265–283.

Bragagnolo C, Vieira FAS, Correia RA, Malhado ACM, Ladle R (2017) Cultural Services in the Caatinga. In: Silva, J. M. C.; Leal, I. R.; Tabarelli, M. (eds.) Caatinga: The Largest Tropical Dry Forest Region in South America. Springer. 335-355. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-68339-3_12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68339-3_12

Cardoso AS, Renna F, Moreno-Llorca R (2022) Classifying the content of social media images to support cultural ecosystem service assessments using deep learning models. Ecosystem Services 54. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101410 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101410

Cheng X, Van Damme S, Li L, Uyttenhove P (2019) Evaluation of cultural ecosystem services: A review of methods. Ecosystem Services 37: 100925. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100925. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100925

Chollet F (2015) Keras. https://github.com/fchollet/keras. 18 Ago. 2021.

CICES (2022) Classificação Internacional Comum de Serviços Ecossistêmicos. https://cices.eu/cices-structure/. 05 Jan. 2022.

Ciesielski M, Stereńczak K (2021) Using Flickr data and selected environmental features to analyze the temporal and spatial distribution of activities in forest areas. Forest Policy and Economy 120. doi: 10.1016/j. forpol.2021.102509 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102509

Clark A (2015) Pillow (PIL Fork) Documentation, read the docs. https://buildmedia.readthedocs.org/media/pdf/pillow/latest/pillow.pdf. 30 Out. 2021.

Colkesen I, Kavzoglu T (2019) Comparative Evaluation of Decision-Forest Algorithms in Object-Based Land Use and Land Cover Mapping. Spatial Modeling in GIS and R for Earth and Environmental Sciences 499-517. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-815226-3.00023-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815226-3.00023-5

Di Minin E, Fraser R, Slotow DC, MacMillan E (2013) Understanding heterogeneous preference of tourists for big game species: implications for conservation and management. Animal Conservation 16: 249–258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795.2012.00595.x

Di Minin E, Tenkanen H, Toivonen T (2015) Prospects and challenges for social media data in conservation science. Environmental Science 3: 63. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2015.00063 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2015.00063

Equipe RStudio (2020) RStudio: Desenvolvimento Integrado para R. RStudio, PBC, Boston, MA. http://www.rstudio.com/. 21 Set. 2021.

Flickr (2014) Flickr API Guide. https://www.flickr.com/services/api/flickr.photos.search.html. 21 Set. 2021.

Ghermandi A, Sinclair M (2019) Passive crowdsourcing of social media in environmental research: A systematic map. Global Environmental Change 55: 36–47. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.02.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.02.003

Google (2022) www.google.com. 29 Set. 2021.

Google Colaboratory (2021) https://colab.research.google.com/. 25 Out. 2021.

Harris CR, Millman KJ, van der Walt SJ (2020) Array programming with NumPy. Nature 585: 357–362. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

Havinga I, Marcos D, Bogaart PW (2021) Social media and deep learning capture the aesthetic quality of the landscape. Scientific Reports 11: 20000. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99282-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99282-0

Hunter JD (2007) Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment. Computing in Science & Engineering 9: 90-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

Jepson PR, Caldecott B, Schmitt SF (2017) Protected area asset stewardship. Biological Conservation 212, 183–190. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.03.032. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.03.032

Ladle RJ, Correia RA, Do Y (2016) Conservation culturomics. Ecology and the Environment 14: 269–275. doi: 10.1002 / taxa.1260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1260

Leal I, Da Silva JM, Tabarelli M, Lacher T (2005) Changing the Course of Biodiversity Conservation in the Caatinga of Northeastern Brazil. Conservation Biology 19: 701 - 706. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00703.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00703.x

Lessa T, Dos Santos JW, Correia RA, Ladle RJ, Malhado AC (2019) Known unknowns: Filling the gaps in scientific knowledge production in the Caatinga. Plos One 14. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219359. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219359

Mark Daoust (2021) Image classification. Disponível em: https://github.com/tensorflow/docs/blob/master/site/en/tutorials/images/classification.ipynb. 21 Set. 2021.

MMA (2016) Visitation Data 2007 - 2016. http://www.icmbio.gov.br/ portal/images/stories/comunicacao/noticias/2017/dados_de_visitacao_2012_2016. 12 Abr. 2022.

MMA (2022) Serviços Ecossistêmicos. https://www.gov.br/mma/pt-br/assuntos/ecossistemas-1/conservacao-1/servicos-ecossistemicos#:~:text=Os%20serviços%20ecossistêmicos%20são%20benefícios,qualidade%20de%20vida%20das%20pessoas. 15 Abr. 2022.

Moreno LR, Méndez PF, Ros-Candeira A (2020) Evaluating tourist profiles and nature-based experiences in Biosphere Reserves using Flickr: matches and mismatches between online social surveys and photo content analysis. Science of The Total Environment 737: 140067. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140067. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140067

Mouttaki I, Bagdanavičiūtė I, Maanan M, Erraiss M, Rhinane H, Mehdi M (2022) Classifying and Mapping Cultural Ecosystem Services Using Artificial Intelligence and Social Media Data. Wetlands 42: 86. doi: 10.1007/s13157-022-01616-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-022-01616-9

Associação Brasileira de Ciência de Dados - ABRACD (2022) hOverfitting e Underfitting em Machine Learning. Htps://abracd.org/overfitting-e-underfitting-em-machine-learning/. 20 Abr. 2022.

Retka J, Jepson P, Ladle RJ (2019) Assessing cultural ecosystem services of a large marine protected area through social media photographs. Ocean and Costal Management 176: 40-48. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.04.018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.04.018

Richards DR, Friess DA (2015) A rapid indicator of cultural ecosystem service usage at a fine spatial scale: content analysis of social media photographs. Ecological Indicators 53: 187–195. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.01.034. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.01.034

Silva JMC, Barbosa LCB, Pinto LPS, Chennault CM (2017) Sustainable development in the Caatinga. In: Silva, J. M. C.; Leal, I. R.; Tabarelli, M. (eds.) Caatinga. The largest tropical dry forest region in South America. Cham: Springer International Publishing 445-460. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68339-3_18

Tabarelli M, Leal IR, Scarano FR, Silva JMC (2018) Caatinga: legado, trajetória e desafios rumo à sustentabilidade. Ciência e Cultura 70: 4. doi: 10.21800/2317-66602018000400009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21800/2317-66602018000400009

Tanaka M (2019) Classificação de imagens com deep learning e TensorFlow. https://imasters.com.br/back-end/classificacao-de-imagens-com-deep-learning-e-tensorflow. 15 Set. 2021.

Utsch KG (2018) Uso De Redes Neurais Convolucionais para classificação de imagens digitais de lesões de pele. Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Brasil. https://ele.ufes.br/sites/engenhariaeletrica.ufes.br/files/field/anexo/kaio_g_utsch.pdf

Zhang J, Xie Y, Wu Q, Xia Y (2019) Medical image classification using synergic deep learning. Medical Image Analysis 54: 10-19. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2019.02.010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2019.02.010

Downloads

Published

10/21/2024

How to Cite

Santana, M. V. A., Oliveira, D. V. B., & Albuquerque, U. (2024). Investigating cultural ecosystem services of the Caatinga on Flickr. Ethnobiology and Conservation, 14. https://doi.org/10.15451/ec2024-10-14.08-1-9

Issue

Section

Short communication

Most read articles by the same author(s)