Hypothesis Testing in Ethnobotany: 30 years After Phillips & Gentry's Seminal Work
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15451/ec2023-06-12.14-1-3References
Albuquerque UP, Oliveira RF. 2007. Is the use-impact on native Caatinga species in Brazil reduced by the high species richness of medicinal plants? Journal of Ethnopharmacology 113:156–170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2007.05.025
Albuquerque UP, Nascimento ALB, Soldati GT, Feitosa IS, Campos JLA, Hurrell JA, Hanazaki N, Medeiros PM, Silva RRV, Ludwinsky RH, Ferreira Júnior WS, Reyes-García V. 2019a. Ten important questions/issues for ethnobotanical research. Acta Botanica Brasilica 33:376-385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-33062018abb0331
Albuquerque UP, Medeiros PM, Ferreira Júnior WS, Silva TC, Silva RRV, Gonçalves-Souza T. 2019b. Social-ecological theory of maximization: basic concepts and two initial models. Biological Theory 14:73–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-019-00316-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-019-00316-8
Albuquerque UP, Ludwig D, Feitosa IS, et al. 2020. Addressing Social-Ecological Systems across Temporal and Spatial Scales: A Conceptual Synthesis for Ethnobiology. Human Ecology 48:557–571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-020-00189-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-020-00189-7
Betts MG, Hadley AS, Frey DW, Frey SJK, Gannon D, Harris SH, Kim H, Kormann UG, Leimberger K, Moriarty K, Northrup JM, Phalan B, Rousseau JS, Stokely TD, Valente JJ, Wolf C, Zárrate-Charry D. 2021. When are hypotheses useful in ecology and evolution? Ecology and Evolution 11:5762-5776. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7365
Farji-Brener AG. 2003. Uso correcto, parcial e incorrecto de los términos "hipótesis" y "predicciones" en ecología. Ecología Austral 13:223-227.
Farji-Brener AG. 2022. ¿Plantear o no plantear hipótesis? Sugerencias para estudiantes, directores y revisores. Ecología Austral 32:434-443. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.22.32.2.0.1914
Ferreira Júnior WS. 2020. Reflections on the theoretical advance in ethnobiology: Are we pointing to the wrong direction? Ethnobiology and Conservation 9:20.
Gaoue OG, Coe MA, Bond M, Hart G, Seyler BC, Mcmillen H. 2017. Theories and major hypotheses in ethnobotany. Economic Botany 71:269–287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-017-9389-8
Gaoue OG, Moutouama JK, Coe MA, Bond MO, Green E, Sero NB, Bezeng BS, Yessoufou K. 2021. Methodological advances for hypothesis-driven ethnobiology. Biological Reviews 96:2281-2303. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12752. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12752
Gonçalves-Souza T, Provete DB, Garey MV, Silva FR, Albuquerque UP. 2019. Going back to basics: How to master the art of making scientifically sound questions. In: Albuquerque UP, Cunha LVF, Lucena RFP, Alves RRN (Eds.) Methods and Techniques in Ethnobiology and Ethnoecology. Springer: New York. p. 71-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-8919-5_7
Gonçalves PHS, Albuquerque UP, Medeiros, PM. 2016. The most commonly available woody plant species are the most useful for human populations: a meta-analysis. Ecol Appl. 26: 2238-2253. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1364 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1364
Phillips O, Gentry AH. 1993. The useful plants of Tambopata, Peru: I. Statistical hypothesis tests with a new quantitative technique. Economic Botany 47:15–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02862203
Ramos MA, Melo JG, Albuquerque UP. 2012. Citation behavior in popular scientific papers: What is behind obscure citations? The case of ethnobotany. Scientometrics 92:711-719. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0662-4
Vandebroek I, Pieroni A, Stepp JR, Hanazaki N, Ladio A, Alves RRN, Picking D, Delgoda R, Maroyi A, van Andel T, Quave CL, Paniagua-Zambrana NY, Bussmann RW, Odonne G, Abbasi AM, Albuquerque UP, Baker J, Kutz S, Timsina S, Shigeta M, Oliveira TPR, Hurrell JA, Arenas PM, Puentes JP, Hugé J, Yesil Y, Pierre LJ, Olango TM, Dahdouh-Guebas F. 2020. Reshaping the future of ethnobiology research after the COVID-19 pandemic. Nature Plants 6:723-730. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-020-0691-6
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ulysses Albuquerque; Washington Soares Ferreira Júnior
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
