Sensory attributes of native stingless bee honey (Plebeia molesta): first approaches to the characterization and preference of local consumers

Visualizações: 1070

Authors

  • Melisa Gabriela Geisa IDACOR, UNC - CONICET
  • María Cristina Ciappini Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo en Tecnología de los Alimentos, Facultad Regional Rosario, Universidad Tecnológica Nacional. Zeballos 1341, Rosario, CP2000, Santa Fe, Argentina.
  • Norma Inés Hilgert Instituto de Biología Subtropical, Universidad Nacional de Misiones – CONICET. Facultad de Ciencias Forestales, UNaM. Asoc. Civil Centro de Investigaciones del Bosque Atlántico. Bertoni 85, Puerto Iguazú, CP 3370, Misiones, Argentina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15451/ec2021-06-10.27-1-15

Keywords:

Native stingless bee, Chaco region, peasants, conservation through use, quella

Abstract

The sensory quality of a food is related to the consumer’s ethno-social and idiosyncratic conditions.  In this study, honeys from three different environments in the Chaco region of Córdoba (Argentina) were described qualitatively and quantitatively by specialized evaluators and rural peasant. Honeys with a wide diversity of sensory attributes were evidenced. The samples from Salinas Coast were characterized by high fluidity, those from Serrano Forest by quantity of crystals, and those from Plain Forest by the greatest persistence of taste. The rural population used some shared descriptors for honeys from similar geographical origin. Most rural consumers distinguished the honey from A. mellifera, Plebeia nov. sp. and P. molesta, which were also the preferred ones. We analyzed the results in relation to the Socio-ecological Theory of Maximization and concluded that the sensory components of P. molesta honeys allow their differentiation according to environment of origin and from honeys of other melliferous insects, which together with farmers´ idiosyncratic factors model the selection of the product.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Melisa Gabriela Geisa, IDACOR, UNC - CONICET

Becaria Doctoral CONICET, UNC

María Cristina Ciappini, Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo en Tecnología de los Alimentos, Facultad Regional Rosario, Universidad Tecnológica Nacional. Zeballos 1341, Rosario, CP2000, Santa Fe, Argentina.

Doctor, Magister in Food Technology. Teaching Specialist. Chemical engineer

Norma Inés Hilgert, Instituto de Biología Subtropical, Universidad Nacional de Misiones – CONICET. Facultad de Ciencias Forestales, UNaM. Asoc. Civil Centro de Investigaciones del Bosque Atlántico. Bertoni 85, Puerto Iguazú, CP 3370, Misiones, Argentina

Dra. In Biological Sciences. Independent Researcher of the Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) and Regular Adjunct Professor at the Facultad de Ciencias Forestales, UNaM. Place of work: Instituto de Biología Subtropical –IBS- (Iguazú, UNaM/CONICET)

References

Albuquerque UP, de Medeiros PM, Júnior WSF, da Silva TC, da Silva RRV, Gonçalves-Souza T (2019) Social-Ecological Theory of Maximization: Basic Concepts and Two Initial Models. Teoría biológica 14 (2):73-85 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-019-00316-8

Álvarez LJ, Rasmussen C, Abrahamovich AH (2016) Nueva especie de Plebeia Schwarz, clave para las especies argentinas de Plebeia y comentarios sobre Plectoplebeia en la Argentina (Hymenoptera: Meliponini). Rev. Mus. Argent. Cienc. Nat. 18(1):65-74 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22179/REVMACN.18.433

Araújo D, Ruiz Pérez-Cacho P, Serrano S, Dios-Palomares R, Galán-Soldevilla H (2020) Sensory Profile and Physico-Chemical Properties of Artisanal Honey from Zulia, Venezuela. Foods 9(3):339 doi:10.3390/foods9030339 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9030339

Balzarini M, Bruno C, Córdoba M, Teich I (2015) Herramientas en el análisis estadístico multivariado. Escuela Virtual Internacional CAVILA, Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina

Belusso AC, Nogueira BA, Breda LS, Mitterer-Daltoé ML (2016) Check all that apply (CATA) as an instrument for the development of fish products. Food Science and Technology 36(2):275-281 doi:10.1590/1678-457X.0026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-457X.0026

Bernard HR (2000) Social Research Methods. Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, Londres, Nueva Delhi

Carvalho RMA, Feitosa Martins C, Nóbrega Alves RR, Chaves Alves ÂG (2018) Do emotions influence the motivations and preferences of keepers of stingless bees? Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine. 14:47 doi:10.1186/s13002-018-0246-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-018-0246-3

Ciappini MC (2011) Sensory analysis applied to bee honey. In: Calviño A. (ed) Recent Contributions to Sensory Analysis of Foods. Research Signpost, Kerala, India, pp. 21-32

Ciappini MC, Di Vito MV, Gatti MB, Calviño AM (2013) Development of a Quantitative Descriptive Sensory Honey Analysis: Application to Eucalyptus and Clover Honeys. Advance Journal of Food Science and Technology 5(7):829-838 doi:10.19026/ajfst.5.3169 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19026/ajfst.5.3169

Deliza R, Vit P (2013) Sensory Evaluation of Stingless Bee Pot-Honey Chapter 24. In: Vit P, Pedro SRM, Roubik D (Eds.). Pot-Honey: A legacy of stingless bees Springer Science & Business Media, New York, EEUU, pp. 349-361 doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-4960-7_24 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4960-7_24

Ferreira EL, Lencioni C, Benassi MT, Barth MO, Bastos DHM (2009) Descriptive Sensory Analysis and Acceptance of Stingless Bee Honey. Food Sci Tech Int. 15(3):251-258 doi:10.1177/1082013209341136 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1082013209341136

Flores FF, Hilgert NI, Lupo L (2018) Melliferous insects and the uses assigned to their products in the northern Yungas of Salta, Argentina. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 14:27 doi:10.1186/s13002-018-0222-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-018-0222-y

Garzón JM, Young M (2016) La actividad apícola en Córdoba. Aspectos básicos y potencial productivo. IERAL – Ministerio de Agricultura y Ganadería de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina.

Geisa MG (2020) Análisis de los usos locales y la calidad de mieles de abejas nativas sin aguijón del noroeste de Córdoba, Argentina. PhD Thesis. IDACOR, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba – CONICET, Córdoba, Argentina.

Geisa MG, Hilgert NI (2019) The honey of Plebeia molesta and other melliferous insects in the peasant culture of the Northwest of Córdoba, Argentina. Ethnobiology and Conservation 8:11 doi:10.15451/ec2019-08-8.11-1-18 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15451/ec2019-08-8.11-1-18

Gennari GP (2019) Manejo racional de las abejas nativas sin aguijón – ANSA. Ediciones INTA, Famaillá, Tucumán, Argentina.

Greenleaf SS, Williams NM, Winfree R, Kremen C (2007) Bee foraging ranges and their relationship to body size. Oecologia 153:589–596 doi:10.1007/s00442-007-0752-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-007-0752-9

Grimaldi PA, Trillo C (2018) Prácticas y usos tradicionales de “cerco” y “monte” por los criollos de San Marcos Sierras (Córdoba, Argentina). Bonplandia 27(1):81-98 doi:10.30972/bon.2712986 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30972/bon.2712986

INTA (2016) Protocolo para la toma de muestras de productos y ejemplares de abejas nativas sin aguijón (ANSA) para su análisis y caracterización. Gennari GP, Salomon V (eds) INTA, Estación Experimental Agropecuaria, Famaillá, Tucumán, Argentina

Maurici B, Pozzo LR, Recanati GB (2018) Descripción Sensorial Cuantitativa de la Miel de Acacia. Revista Tecnología y Ciencia 32:244-249

Montenegro G, Gómez M, Pizarro R, Casaubon G, Peña RC (2008) Implementación de un panel sensorial para mieles chilenas. Ciencia e Investigación Agraria. 35(1):51-58 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-16202008000100005

Morello J, Rodriguez AF, Silva M (2012) Ecorregión del Chaco Seco. Capítulo 4. In: Morello J, Mateucci SD, Rodriguez AF, Silva ME (eds) Ecorregiones y Complejos ecosistémicos argentinos. Orientación Gráfica Editora, Buenos Aires, Argentina, pp.151-203.

PNUD Argentina (2019) Uso sustentable de biodiversidad (USUBI). Argentina. Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo. [http://www.ar.undp.org] Accessed 30 January 2021

Sancho Valls J, Bota Prieto E, de Castro Martín JJ (1999) Introducción al análisis sensorial de los alimentos. Edicions Universitat, Barcelona, España

Secretaría de regulación y gestión sanitaria y Secretaría de alimentos y bioeconomía (2019) Official Gazette República Argentina. Resolución Conjunta 17/2019 [https://www.boletinoficial.gob.ar/detalleAviso/primera/206764/20190502] Accessed 27 December 2020

Shack DN (1995) El gusto del catador: determinantes sociales y culturales de las preferencias alimentarias. In: Contreras J (ed). Alimentación y cultura: necesidades, gustos y costumbres Edicions Universitat Barcelona, Barcelona, España, pp.111-129

Sutton DE (2001) Remembrance of repasts: an anthropology of food and memory. Berg Publishers, New York DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350044883

Vit P (2008) Valorización de la miel de abejas sin aguijón (Meliponini). Revista de la Facultad de la Farmacia 50(2):20-28

Vit P, Sancho T, Fernandez M, Pascual A, Deliza R (2011) Sensory perception of tropical honeys by Spanish consumers, using free choice profile. Journal of ApiProduct and ApiMedical Science 3(4):174–180 doi:10.3896/IBRA.4.03.4.04 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3896/IBRA.4.03.4.04

Zamudio F, Hilgert NI (2017) Cultural, Psychological and Organoleptic Factors Related to the Use of Stingless Bees by Rural Residents of Northern Misiones, Argentina. Chapter 20. In: Vit P, Pedro SRM, Roubik DW (eds) Pot-Pollen in Stingless Bee Melittology Springer, New York, EEUU, pp.283-297 doi:10.1007/978-3-319-61839-5_20 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61839-5_20

Downloads

Published

06/09/2021

How to Cite

Geisa, M. G., Ciappini, M. C., & Hilgert, N. I. (2021). Sensory attributes of native stingless bee honey (Plebeia molesta): first approaches to the characterization and preference of local consumers. Ethnobiology and Conservation, 10. https://doi.org/10.15451/ec2021-06-10.27-1-15

Issue

Section

Original research article