Local community knowledge and perceptions in the Colombian Caribbean towards Amphibians in urban and rural settings: tools for biological conservation

Danny Vergara-Rios; Andres Camilo Montes-Correa; J. Nicolas Urbina-Cardona; Miguel De Luque-Villa; Pedro E. Cattan; Hernan Dario Granda

doi:10.15451/ec2021-05-10.24-1-22

Authors

Danny Vergara-Rios
Andres Camilo Montes-Correa
J. Nicolas Urbina-Cardona
Miguel De Luque-Villa
Pedro E. Cattan
Hernan Dario Granda

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15451/ec2021-05-10.24-1-22

Abstract

Human perceptions vary between rural and urban environments, determining the degree to which people are able to coexist with biodiversity. It is important to identify the sociodemographic factors that determine these local perceptions to adjust amphibian conservation strategies in recognition of the particular conditions of different human communities. In this research, the effect of the urban or rural location where people live and sociodemographic variables in the knowledge and perceptions about amphibians was determined. The data were collected through individual semi-structured surveys of 401 participants. We measured seven response variables through the Likert scale, which ranges from 1 (totally disagree) to 5 (totally agree). For each response variable, a multivariate analysis of variance was performed. Ninety-two percent of people correctly recognized frogs and toads as amphibians, but there was confusion in classifying caecilians and salamanders within this group or including reptiles within amphibians. This confusion was more evident for women from urban locality. Positive perceptions of amphibians varied between urban and rural locality for young adults, people with a high school education level, and people without formal education. Negative beliefs varied between urban and rural locations for women, adolescents, young adults, and professionals. Half of the people accepted information on the conservation of amphibians. Positive perceptions of people about amphibians should be used as a flag to strengthen environmental educational strategies, mainly in urban locations. The results suggest that amphibian conservation plans that aim to inform and educate the public should be focused differently for age groups, genders, and educational level for people in urban and rural locations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acosta-Galvis AR (2021) Lista de los Anfibios de Colombia. [http://www.batrachia.com].

Acosta-Galvis AR, Huertas-Salgado C, Rada M (2006) Aproximación al conocimiento de los anfibios en una localidad del Magdalena medio (Departamento de Caldas, Colombia). Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales 30:291–303.

Acuña-Vargas JC (2016) Anfibios y Reptiles asociados a cinco coberturas de la tierra, municipio de Dibulla, La Guajira, Colombia. Acta Zoológica Mexicana 32:133-146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21829/azm.2016.322940

Agudelo-Hernádez WJ, Urbina-Cardona JN, Armenteras-Pascual D (2019) Critical shifts on spatial traits and the risk of extinction of Andean anurans: an assessment of the combined effects of climate and land-use change in Colombia. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation 17:206–219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2019.11.002

Albuquerque UP, Cunha LVFC, Lucena RFP, Alves RRN (2016) Methods and Techniques in Ethnobiology and Ethnoecology. Springer, New York.

Aldana-Domínguez J, Montes C, Martínez M, Medina N, Hahn J, Duque M (2017) Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Knowledge in the Colombian Caribbean: Progress and Challenges. Tropical Conservation Science 10: 1940082917714229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1940082917714229

Ali W, Javid A, Hussain A, Bukhari SM (2017) Public attitude towards amphibian and reptiles in district Kasur, Punjab, Pakistan. Punjab University Journal of Zoology 32:173–178.

Alves RRDN, Da Silva Vieira WL, Santana-Gomes G (2008) Reptiles used in traditional folk medicine: Conservation implications. Biodiversity and Conservation 17:2037–2049. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-007-9305-0

Alves RRN, Souto WMS (2011) Ethnozoology in Brazil: Current status and perspectives. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 7:22 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-7-22

Alves RRN, Souto WMS (2015) Ethnozoology: A brief introduction. Ethnobiology and Conservation 4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15451/ec2015-1-4.1-1-13

Alves RRN, Vieira KS, Santana GG, Vieira WLS, Almeida WO, Souto WMS, Montenegro PFGP, Pezzuti JCB (2012) A review on human attitudes towards reptiles in Brazil. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 184:6877–6901. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-011-2465-0

Anderson MJ, Gorley RN, Clarke KR (2008) PERMANOVA+ for PRIMER: Guide to software and statistical methods. Primer-e, Plymouth, UK.

Angarita-M O, Montes-Correa AC, Renjifo JM (2015) Amphibians and reptiles of an agroforestry system in the Colombian Caribbean. Amphibian & Reptile Conservation 8:19–38.

Barrio-Amorós CL, Manrique R (2007) Observations of Natural History of the green Anaconda A (Eunectes murinus Linnaeus, 1758) in the Venezuelan Llanos. An ecotoruristic perspective. Fundación Andígena 15:34.

Becker U (2000) The Continuum Encyclopaedia of Symbols. The Continuum International Publishing, New York.

Brom P, Anderson P, Channing A, Underhill LG (2020) The role of cultural norms in shaping attitudes towards amphibians in Cape Town, South Africa. PLoS ONE 15:1–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219331

Campos CM, Nates-Jimenez J, Lindemann-Matthies P (2013) Percepción y conocimiento de la biodiversidad por estudiantes urbanos y rurales de las tierras áridas del centro-oeste de Argentina. Ecologia Austral 23:174–183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.13.23.3.0.1172

Carbono E, Lozano-Contreras G (1997) Endemismos y otras singularidades de la Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, Colombia. Posibles causas de origen y necesidad de conservarlosNo Title. Revista de la Academia colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales 21:409–419.

Casas Andreu G (2004) Nuevas interpretaciones y adiciones a los anfibios y reptiles en la obra del naturalista Francisco Hernández (1517-1584). Ciencia Ergo Sum 11:308–312.

Castillo L, Ladio A (2019) Zootherapy and rural livestock farmers in semiarid Patagonia: the transfer of animal aptitudes for health. Ethnobiology and Conservation 8:1–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15451/ec2019-01-8.02-1-23

Ceríaco LMP (2012) Human attitudes towards herpetofauna: The influence of folklore and negative values on the conservation of amphibians and reptiles in Portugal. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 8:1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-8-8

Clarke K, Warwick R (2001) Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation. 2nd edition. Primer-E, Plymouth, United Kingdom.

Cleary A, Fielding KS, Murray Z, Roiko A (2020) Predictors of Nature Connection Among Urban Residents: Assessing the Role of Childhood and Adult Nature Experiences. Environment and Behavior 52:579-610. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916518811431

Cortés-Suárez JE (2017) Uso de microhábitat por parte del sapo gigante Rhinella horribilis en pastizales en el municipio de Villa de Leyva, Boyacá, Colombia. Revista Biodiversidad Neotropical 7:253-257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18636/bioneotropical.v7i4.701

Cuesta-Ríos EY, Moreno LER (2012) Importancia etnozoológica de herpetos en bosques de la selva pluvial central del Chocó. Bioetnia 9:244–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51641/bioetnia.v9i2.89

DANE (2018) Resultado censo nacional de población y vivienda 2018. [https://www.dane.gov.co/files/censo2018/informacion-tecnica/cnpv-2018-presentacion-3ra-entrega.pdf].

Duméril AMC, Bibron G (1941) Erpétologie Genérale ou Histoire Naturelle Complète des Reptiles. Paris: Librarie Enclyclopedique de Roret 8.

Ellen RF, Stimson AF, Menzies J (1976) Structure and inconsistency in Nuaulu categories for amphibians. Journal d’agriculture tropicale et de botanique appliquée 23:125–138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/jatba.1976.3245

Enríquez Vázquez P, Mariaca Méndez R, Retana Guiascón OG, Naranjo Piñera EJ (2006) Uso medicinal de la fauna silvestre en los Altos de Chiapas, México. Interciencia 31:491–499.

Fundacion Prosierra (1998) Evaluación Ecológica Rápida de la Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta. Definición de Áreas Críticas para la Conservación de la Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, Colombia. Ministerio del Medio Ambiente, UAESPPNN The Nature Conservacy -USAID- Embajada de Japón, Santa Marta.

Gallardo JM (1994) Anfibios y Reptiles. Relatos y Leyendas, Etimologías, Usos y Abusos. Librería Agropecuaria, Buenos aires.

Gibbons JW (2003) Societal values and attitudes: their history and sociological influences on amphibian conservation problems. In: Semlistch R. (ed) Amphibian Conservation. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, pp. 324.

Gonçalves PHS, Rego AEM, Medeiros PM de (2019) People’s perceptions and attitudes along the migratory path of a scavenger bird. Ethnobiology and Conservation 8:1–11.

Granda-Rodríguez HD, Montes-Correa AC, Jiménez-Bolaño JD, Alaniz AJ, Cattan PE, Hernáez P (2020) Insights into the natural history of the endemic Harlequin Toad, Atelopus laetissimus Ruiz-Carranza, Ardila-Robayo, and Hernandez-Camacho, 1994 (Anura: Bufonidae), in the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, Colombia. Amphibian and Reptile Conservation 14:29-42.

Granda-Rodríguez HD, Del Portillo-Mozo A, Renjifo J, Bolaños F (2012) ¿Están declinando todos los Atelopus de alta montaña? el caso de las ranas arlequín de la Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, Colombia. Herpetotropicos 7:21–30.

Gutiérrez-Santillán TV, Albuquerque UP, Valenzuela-Galván D, Reyes-Zepeda F, Vázquez LB, Mora-Olivo A, Arellano-Méndez LU (2018) Trends on mexican ethnozoological research, vertebrates case: a systematic review. Ethnobiology and Conservation 9:1–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15451/ec2019-01-8.01-1-39

Henriquez V (2012) Mitos y leyendas sobre los anfibios y reptiles de El Salvador. Bioma 1:25–27.

Hernández-Camacho JI, Sanchez H (1992) Biomas terrestres de Colombia. In: Halffter GI (ed) La Diversidad Biológica de Iberoamérica. Acta Zoológica Mexicana, Mexico, pp. 153−174.

Huntington HP (2000) Using Traditional Ecological Knowledge in Science: Methods and Applications. Ecological Applications 10:1270–1274. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1270:UTEKIS]2.0.CO;2

IUCN (2020) The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. [https://www.iucnredlist.org/]

Jensen JB, Camp CD (2003) Human exploitation of amphibians: Direct and indirect impacts. Amphibian Conservation 199–213.

Kahn TR, La Marca E, Lötters S, Brown J., Twomey E, Amézquita A (2015) Aposematic Poison Frogs (Dendrobatidae) of the Andean Countries: Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, Perú and Venezuela. Conservation International Tropical Field Guide Series, Conservation International, Arlington, Virginia, U.S.A.

Kellert SR, Berry JK (1987) Attitudes, Knowledge, and Behaviours toward Wildlife as Affected by Gender. Wildlife Society Bulletin 15:363–371.

Kimmerer RW (2002) Weaving traditional ecological knowledge into biological education: A call to action. BioScience 52:432–438. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0432:WTEKIB]2.0.CO;2

De La Ossa-Lacayo A, De La Ossa J (2012) Utilización de fauna silvestre en el área rural de caimito, sucre, colombia. Revista Colombiana de Ciencia Animal - RECIA 4:46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24188/recia.v4.n1.2012.266

Legast A (1987) El animal en el mundo mítico Tairona. Publicación de la Fundación de Investigaciones Arqueológicas Nacionales 144–145.

Lindemann-matthies P (2002) The Influence of an Educational Program on Children’s Perception of Biodiversity. The Journal of Environmental Education 33:22–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00958960209600805

Luiz W, Vieira S (2014) Caatinga Ethnoherpetology : Relationships between herpeto- fauna and people in a semiarid region of northeastern Brazil. Amphibian and Reptile Conservation 8:24-32.

Lyra-Neves RM, Santos EM, Medeiros PM, Alves RRN, Albuquerque UP (2015) Etnozoologia no Brasil: Análise de riscos metodológicos nos trabalhos publicados. Brazilian Journal of Biology 75:184–191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.09314

Matas A (2018) Diseño del formato de escalas tipo Likert: Un estado de la cuestión. Revista Electronica de Investigacion Educativa 20:38–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24320/redie.2018.20.1.1347

Merleau-Ponty M (1985) Fenomenología de la percepción. Planeta-De Agostini, S.A.

Ministerio de ambiente y desarrollo Sostenible (2021) Programa Nacional para la Conservación de los Anfibios en Colombia. Plan de Acción 2020-2030. Bogota.

Miralles A, Raymond M, Lecointre G (2019) Empathy and compassion toward other species decrease with evolutionary divergence time. Scientific Reports 9:1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56006-9

Montes-Correa A, Saboyá-Acosta L, Vergara-Ríos D, Ávila-Silva Y, Jimenez-Bolaños J, Renjifo JM (2015) Herpetofauna del campus de la Universidad del Magdalena, Santa Marta, Colombia. Revista Biodiversidad Neotropical 5:54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18636/bioneotropical.v5i1.149

Mueses-Cisneros JJ, Ballen GA (2007) Un nuevo caso de alerta sobre posible amenaza a una fauna nativa de Anfibios en Colombia: Primer reporte de la Rana Toro (Lithobates catesbeianus). Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales 31:165–166.

Nates-Jimenez J, Campos C, Lindemann-Matthies P (2010) Students’ perception of plant and animal species: A case study from rural Argentina. Applied Environmental Education and Communication 9:131–141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1533015X.2010.482495

Nates-Jimenez J, Lindemann-Matthies P (2015a) Public knowledge and perception of toads and frogs in three areas of subtropical southeast China. Society and Animals 23:166–192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15685306-12341368

Nates-Jimenez J, Lindemann-Matthies P (2015b) Public Knowledge of, and Attitudes to, Frogs in Colombia. Anthrozoos: A Multidisciplinary Journal of The Interactions of People & Animals 28:319–332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2015.11435405

Nishida AK, Nordi N (2006) Mollusc Gathering in Northeast Brazil : An Ethnoecological Approach. Human Ecology 34:133–145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-005-9005-x

Noriega JA, Zapata-Prisco C, García H, Hernández E, Hernández J, Martínez R, Santos-Santos JH, Pablo-Cea JD, Calatayud J (2020) Does ecotourism impact biodiversity? An assessment using dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae) as bioindicators in a tropical dry forest natural park. Ecological Indicators 117:106580. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106580

Osorno M, Jaramillo M, Atuesta N, Barona A, Roncancio N (2014) La Despensa del Tiquié: Diagnóstico y manejo comunitario de La fauna de consumo en La Guayana colombiana, Bogotá. Instituto Amazónico de Investigaciones Científicas “SINCHI.”

Pavol P, Fančovičová J (2012) Tolerance of amphibians in Slovakian people: A comparison of pond owners and non-owners. Anthrozoos 25:277–288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2752/175303712X13403555186136

Peltzer PM, Lajmanovich RC, Attademo AM, Cejas W (2005) Diversidad y conservación de anuros en ecosistemas agrícolas de Argentina : implicancias en el control bio- lógico de plagas. Miscelánea 14:399–416.

Penguilly-Macias MA, Moreno-Fuentes Á, Goyenechea-Mayer I, Espinosa-Pineda. G (2010) Percepción acerca de las lagartijas consideradas nocivas por algunos otomíes, nahuas, tepehuas y mestizos en el estado de Hidalgo, México. Sistemas biocognitivos tradicionales, paradigmas en la conservación biológica y el fortalecimiento cultural 99–104.

Riós-Orjuela JC, Falcón-Espitia N, Arias-Escobar A, Espejo-Uribe MJ, Chamorro-Vargas CT (2020) Knowledge and interactions of the local community with the herpetofauna in the forest reserve of Quininí (Tibacuy-Cundinamarca, Colombia). Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 16:1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-020-00370-8

Roach NS, Urbina-Cardona N, Lacher TE (2020) Land cover drives amphibian diversity across steep elevational gradients in an isolated neotropical mountain range: Implications for community conservation. Global Ecology and Conservation 22:e00968. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e00968

Rudd MA (2011) Scientists’ Opinions on the Global Status and Management of Biological Diversity. Conservation Biology 25:1165–1175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01772.x

Schmidt O (1857) Diagnosen neuer Frösche des zoologischen Cabinets zu Krakau. Akad. Wiss. Wien, Phys. Math. Naturwiss. 24.

Schneider JG (1799) Historia Amphibiorum Naturalis et Literarariae. Fasciculus Primus. Continens Ranas, Calamitas, Bufones, Salamandras et Hydros in Genera et Species Descriptos Notisque suis Distinctos. Jena: Friederici Frommanni. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.4270

Selinske MJ, Garrard GE, Gregg EA, Kusmanoff AM, Kidd LR, Cullen MT, Cooper M, Geary WL, Hatty MA, Hames F, Kneebone S, McLeod EM, Ritchie EG, Squires ZE, Thomas J, Willcock MAW, Blair S, Bekessy SA (2020) Identifying and prioritizing human behaviors that benefit biodiversity. Conservation Science and Practice . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.249

Shrestha B, Shah KB (2017) Mountain Survey of Amphibians and Reptiles and their Conservation Status in Manaslu Conservation Area, Gorkha District, Western Nepal. Conservation Science 5:13–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/cs.v5i1.24297

Tarrant J, Kruger D, Preez LHD (2016) Do Public Attitudes Affect Conservation Effort Using a Questionnaire-Based Survey to Assess Perceptions, Beliefs and Superstitions Associated with Frogs in South Africa. African Zoology 51:13–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15627020.2015.1122554

Teixeira JVDS, Dos Santos JS, Guanaes DHA, da Rocha WD, Schiavetti A (2020) Uses of wild vertebrates in traditional medicine by farmers in the region surrounding the serra do conduru state park (Bahia, Brazil). Biota Neotropica 20:1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1676-0611-bn-2019-0793

Tomažič I (2011) Reported experiences enhance favourable attitudes toward toads. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 7:253–262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75207

Tomažic I, Šorgo A (2017) Factors affecting students’ attitudes toward toads. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 13:2505–2528. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01237a

Torres MNY, Medina N (2014) Representaciones en estudiantes de básica primaria acerca de especies carismáticas y no carismáticas en instituciones educativas rurales y urbanas. Bio-grafía. Escritos sobre la Biología y su Enseñanza 7:21–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17227/20271034.12biografia21.32

Tyler MJ, Wassersug R, Smith B (2007) How frogs and humans interact: Influences beyond habitat destruction, epidemics and global warming. Applied Herpetology 4:1–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/157075407779766741

Valencia-Aguilar A, Cortés-Gómez AM, Ruiz-Agudelo CA (2013) Ecosystem services provided by amphibians and reptiles in Neotropical ecosystems. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services and Management 9:257–272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2013.821168

Vallejo JR, González JA (2015) Amphibians in Spanish popular medicine and the pharmacopoeia of Pliny and Dioscorides. Historia, Ciencias, Saude - Manguinhos 22:1283–1319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-59702015005000010

Wiegmann AF (1833) Herpetologischen Beyträge. I. Ueber die mexicanischen Kröten nebst bemerkungen über ihren verwandte Arten anderer Weltgegenden. Isis von Oken 26:651–662.

Xie F, Lau MWN, Stuart SN, Chanson JS, Cox NA, Fischman DL (2007) Conservation needs of amphibians in China: A review. Science in China, Series C: Life Sciences 50:265–276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-007-0021-5

Zippel K, Johnson K, Gagliardo R, Gibson R, McFadden M, Browne R, Martinez C, Townsend E (2011) The amphibian Ark: A global community for ex situ conservation of amphibians. Herpetological Conservation and Biology 6:340–352.