Do scientists know how to cite their peers?

Ulysses Albuquerque; Rômulo Romeu Nóbrega Alves

doi:10.15451/ec2025-02-14.15-1-3

Autores

Ulysses Albuquerque Universidade Federal de PernambucoBrazil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8131-8429
Rômulo Romeu Nóbrega Alves Universidade Estadual da Paraiba https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6824-0797

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15451/ec2025-02-14.15-1-3

Resumo

Science is often portrayed as an objective and neutral endeavor. However, it is, in fact, permeated by moral and epistemological disputes. Rather than representing a homogeneous or entirely consensual field, scientific practice is marked by divergences that reflect different worldviews, values, and interests. These disputes extend beyond technical issues to encompass ethical and political questions—such as which knowledge is validated, which voices are heard, and which research agendas are prioritized.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

Albuquerque UP (2024) O Excesso de positividade e o sofrimento acadêmico: Transversalidades em Byung-Chul Han e Franco "Bifo" Berardi. Prometheus - Journal of Philosophy 16(46). https://doi.org/10.52052/issn.2176-5960.pro.v16i46.21423 DOI: https://doi.org/10.52052/issn.2176-5960.pro.v16i46.21423

Albuquerque UP, Jacob MCM, Alves RRN (2022) Celebrating the 10th anniversary of ethnobiology and conservation. Ethnobiology and Conservation 11. https://doi.org/10.15451/ec2022-08-11.27-1-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15451/ec2022-08-11.27-1-4

Albuquerque UP, Alves RRN, Carmo RFR (2024) Is there a neocolonial stance in ethnobiology? Ethnobiology and Conservation 13. https://doi.org/10.15451/ec2024-01-13.06-1-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15451/ec2024-01-13.06-1-4

Blancke S (2022) Science as a moral system. Synthese 200:454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03877-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03877-7

Bruton SV, Macchione AL, Brown M, et al. (2024) Citation ethics: An exploratory survey of norms and behaviors. Journal of Academic Ethics. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-024-09539-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-024-09539-2

Culotta E, Chakradhar S, Ortega RP (2024) Remapping science. Science 385(6709):592–594. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.ads2667

Derks B, Manzi F, Van Laar C, et al. (2025) Do not blame ‘queen bees’ for gender inequality in academia. Nat Hum Behav 9: 227. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-02100-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-02100-6

Dworkin JD, Linn KA, Teich EG, et al. (2020) The extent and drivers of gender imbalance in neuroscience reference lists. Nature Neuroscience 23:918–926. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-0658-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-0658-y

Erikson MG, Erlandson P (2014) A taxonomy of motives to cite. Social Studies of Science 44(4):625–637. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312714522871 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312714522871

Teich EG, Kim JZ, Lynn CW, et al. (2022) Citation inequity and gendered citation practices in contemporary physics. Nature Physics 18:1161–1170. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-022-01770-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-022-01770-1