Do scientists know how to cite their peers?
Visualizações: 124DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15451/ec2025-02-14.15-1-3Resumen
Science is often portrayed as an objective and neutral endeavor. However, it is, in fact, permeated by moral and epistemological disputes. Rather than representing a homogeneous or entirely consensual field, scientific practice is marked by divergences that reflect different worldviews, values, and interests. These disputes extend beyond technical issues to encompass ethical and political questions—such as which knowledge is validated, which voices are heard, and which research agendas are prioritized.Descargas
Citas
Albuquerque UP (2024) O Excesso de positividade e o sofrimento acadêmico: Transversalidades em Byung-Chul Han e Franco "Bifo" Berardi. Prometheus - Journal of Philosophy 16(46). https://doi.org/10.52052/issn.2176-5960.pro.v16i46.21423 DOI: https://doi.org/10.52052/issn.2176-5960.pro.v16i46.21423
Albuquerque UP, Jacob MCM, Alves RRN (2022) Celebrating the 10th anniversary of ethnobiology and conservation. Ethnobiology and Conservation 11. https://doi.org/10.15451/ec2022-08-11.27-1-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15451/ec2022-08-11.27-1-4
Albuquerque UP, Alves RRN, Carmo RFR (2024) Is there a neocolonial stance in ethnobiology? Ethnobiology and Conservation 13. https://doi.org/10.15451/ec2024-01-13.06-1-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15451/ec2024-01-13.06-1-4
Blancke S (2022) Science as a moral system. Synthese 200:454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03877-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03877-7
Bruton SV, Macchione AL, Brown M, et al. (2024) Citation ethics: An exploratory survey of norms and behaviors. Journal of Academic Ethics. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-024-09539-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-024-09539-2
Culotta E, Chakradhar S, Ortega RP (2024) Remapping science. Science 385(6709):592–594. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.ads2667
Derks B, Manzi F, Van Laar C, et al. (2025) Do not blame ‘queen bees’ for gender inequality in academia. Nat Hum Behav 9: 227. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-02100-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-02100-6
Dworkin JD, Linn KA, Teich EG, et al. (2020) The extent and drivers of gender imbalance in neuroscience reference lists. Nature Neuroscience 23:918–926. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-0658-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-0658-y
Erikson MG, Erlandson P (2014) A taxonomy of motives to cite. Social Studies of Science 44(4):625–637. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312714522871 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312714522871
Teich EG, Kim JZ, Lynn CW, et al. (2022) Citation inequity and gendered citation practices in contemporary physics. Nature Physics 18:1161–1170. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-022-01770-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-022-01770-1
Descargas
- HTML (English) 28
- PDF (English) 65
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Ulysses Albuquerque; Rômulo Romeu Nóbrega Alves
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
