Landscapes preferences in the human species: insights for ethnobiology from evolutionary psychology

Joelson Moreno Brito Moura; Washington Soares Ferreira Junior; Taline Cristina Silva; Ulysses Paulino Albuquerque

doi:10.15451/ec2017-07-6.10-1-7

Autores

Joelson Moreno Brito Moura Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco
Washington Soares Ferreira Junior Universidade de Pernambuco
Taline Cristina Silva Universidade Estadual de Alagoas
Ulysses Paulino Albuquerque

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15451/ec2017-07-6.10-1-7

Palavras-chave:

Evolutionary Ethnobiology, Evolutionary Psychology, Socioecological Systems

Resumo

According to evolutionary psychology, landscapes preferences by the human species are influenced by their evolutionary past. A set of psychological processes may have been selected to guide the selection of landscapes that offered advantages for the survival and reproduction of human groups in the past. In addition, these psychological mechanisms may also influence the current human behavior in landscapes preference. Based on this, Gordon Orians postulated the savanna hypothesis, which predicts that the human being prefers these environments, since in the past, African savanna environments had a set of important characteristics for survival. If this is true, there are important implications for ethnobiological studies that seek to understand the factors that can influence the selection and management of landscapes by human groups.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

Albuquerque UP, Ferreira Júnior WSF (2016) What Do We Study in Evolutionary Ethnobiology? Defining the Theoretical Basis for a Research Program. Evolutionary Biology doi 10.1007/s11692-016-9398-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-016-9398-z

Andrews P (1989) Palaeoecology of Laetoli. Journal of Human Evolution 18: 173-181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2484(89)90071-7

Appleton J (1975) The Experience of Landscape. 1 ed. Wiley, London, UK

Balling JD, Falk JH (1982) Development of visual preference for natural environments. Environment and Behavior 14: 5-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916582141001

Blumenschine R (1986) Early hominid scavenging opportunities: Implications of carcass availability in the Serengeti and Ngorongoro ecosystems. Archaeopress, Oxford, UK DOI: https://doi.org/10.30861/9780860543657

Buss DM (1995) Evolutionary psychology: A new paradigm for psychological science. Psychological inquiry 6: 1-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0601_1

Han KT (2007) Responses to six major terrestrial biomes in terms of scenic beauty, preference, and restorativeness. Environment and Behavior 39: 529-556. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916506292016

Hartmann P, Apaolaza-Ibáñez V (2010) Beyond savanna: An evolutionary and environmental psychology approach to behavioral effects of nature scenery in green advertising. Journal of Environmental Psychology 30: 119-128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.10.001

Hartmann P, Apaolaza-Ibáñez V (2013) Desert or rain: Standardisation of green advertising versus adaptation to the target audience's natural environment. European journal of marketing 47: 917-933. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/03090561311308091

Johnson LM, Davidson-Hunt I (2011) Ethnoecology and landscapes.In: Anderson EN, Pearsall DM, Hunn ES, Turner NJ (eds) Ethnobiology. 1 ed. Wiley-Blackwell, New Jersey, pp. 267-284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118015872.ch16

Kaplan R, Kaplan S (1989) The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. 1 ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

Kaplan S (1995) The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology 15: 169-182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2

Klasios J (2016) Evolutionizing human nature. New Ideas in Psychology 40: 103-114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2015.08.004

Korpela KM, Klemettilä T, Hientanen JK (2002) Evidence for rapid affective evaluation of environmental scenes. Environment and Behavior 34: 634-650. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916502034005004

Levis C, Costa FR, Bongers F, Peña-Claros M, Clement CR, Junqueira AB... and Castilho CV (2017) Persistent effects of pre-Columbian plant domestication on Amazonian forest composition. Science, 355: 925-931. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal0157

Lückmann K, Lagemann V, Menzel S (2013) Landscape assessment and evaluation of young people: Comparing nature-orientated habitat and engineered habitat preferences. Environment and Behavior 45: 86-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916511411478

Molares S, Ladio A (2014) Medicinal plants in the cultural landscape of a Mapuche-Tehuelche community in arid Argentine Patagonia: an eco-sensorial approach. Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine doi: 10.1186/1746-4269-10-61 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-10-61

Orians GH (1980) Habitat selection: general theory and applications to human behavior. In: Lockard J (ed). The evolution of human social behavior. 1 ed. Elsevier, Chicago, pp. 49–66

Orians GH, Heerwagen JH (1992) Evolved responses to landscapes. In: Barkow JH, Cosmides L, Tooby J (eds) The adapted mind: evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 555–579

Rodrigo MD (2014) Is the" Savanna Hypothesis" a Dead Concept for Explaining the Emergence of the Earliest Hominins?. Current anthropology: A world journal of the sciences of man 1: 59-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/674530

Saad G, Gill T (2000) Applications of evolutionary psychology in marketing. Psychology and Marketing 17: 1005–1034. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6793(200012)17:12<1005::AID-MAR1>3.0.CO;2-H

Silva TS, Campos LZO, Silva JS, Sousa RS, Albuquerque UP (2016) Biota Perception and Use. In: Albuquerque UP, Alves RRN (eds) Introduction to Ethnobiology. Springer, New York, pp. 99–104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28155-1_15

Sommer R (1997) Further cross-national studies of tree form preferences. Ecological Psychol 9: 153–160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326969eco0902_3

Stanley A (2000) Indigenous land management perspective on conservation and production. In: Barlow T, Thorburn R (eds.) Balancing conservation and production in grassy landscapes. Proceedings of the Bushcare Grassy Landscapes Conference, Canberra, Australia, pp. 98-100

Ulrich RS (1983) Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In: Altman L, Wohlwill J (eds) Human behavior and the environment. 6 ed. Plenum, New York, pp. 85–125 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3539-9_4

Williams KJ, Cary J (2002) Landscape preferences, ecological quality, and biodiversity protection. Environment and Behavior 34: 257-274. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916502034002006